← opinion

The market buys attention more than value, and attention expires

A coin invented by a chatbot, with no website and no promises, reached a billion dollars in two months. A year later it was worth eighty-eight percent less: exactly like all the others in its category, over exactly the same period.
the position
A coin born from a chatbot’s joke came to be worth a billion dollars in two months without promising anyone anything. Look closely and it’s the market with its clothes off.

The timeline, with no comment

On October 18, 2024 an anonymous programmer takes an idea that came out of a conversation between two AI models: a coin with the crudest and most universal name imaginable. They launch it on Solana from a platform that lets you create one in thirty seconds, then immediately sell all their tokens for about 500 dollars and walk away.

From there the coin grows on its own, with nobody running it. In December 2024, less than two months later, its market value passes a billion dollars and it enters the top ten of its kind. The peak comes on January 19, 2025, at $2.52 a token.

Then the scientist who had built the chatbot sells about 20 million dollars of those tokens in a private deal, saying he’ll use the money to fund a foundation. The price falls and doesn’t recover in the ten months that follow: by the end of November 2025 the coin is worth around 300 million, 88 percent below the peak. Every number in this timeline comes from contemporary sources. I report them without recomputing them, because that coin isn’t in our price archive.

thirteen months
whenwhat
October 18, 2024launched; whoever created it takes $500 and disappears
December 2024past a billion in market value
January 19, 2025peak at $2.52
January 202520 million sold by whoever built the chatbot
November 2025around 300 million · 88% below the peak
the timeline as the november 2025 sources reported it. not one of these lines is measured by us.

Timeline reported by the sources: October 18, 2024, launch on Solana and the programmer’s immediate exit for about 500 dollars; December 2024, market value past a billion; January 19, 2025, peak at $2.52; January 2025, sale of about 20 million dollars by the chatbot’s creator; November 2025, around 300 million in market value, 88 percent below the peak.

The one thing that never lied is the name

This coin has no technical paper, no roadmap, no list of partnerships with companies nobody has ever heard of. It never promised to democratize credit, replace the banks or give anyone back their financial sovereignty. It promised nothing.

And that makes it more honest than half the projects next to it in the rankings. When a token with fifty pages of documentation and a board of advisers in blazers loses ninety percent, anyone who put money in feels betrayed, and rightly so. When the same happens to a coin with a fart in its name, there’s no betrayal left to claim.

Mind you, that’s a diagnosis more than a compliment. If the most honest project in the category is the one declaring it’s worth nothing, then the others are selling the same thing in a tie. Buyers run the same risk either way; the only difference is how much they were told first.

If the most honest project in the category is the one declaring it’s worth nothing, the others are selling the same thing in a tie

And meanwhile, the others we can measure

Here what we’re told ends and what we can count begins. Our price archive doesn’t have that coin, but it has six from the same family, with years of daily closes behind them. All six hit their cycle peak inside the same four-week window, between November 13 and December 9, 2024.

A year later, as I write, all of them are below it. The least damaged is doge, at −69 percent from its own peak; the worst is wif, at −91. Six different coins, born in different years with different communities, falling together, in the same direction and by the same order of magnitude.

−69%doge−75%shiba−82%floki−83%pepe−83%bonk−91%wif
how far below their own cycle peak they stood, as of november 30, 2025. source: cointalks price archive, daily closes.

Distance from the cycle peak as of November 30, 2025, computed on the daily closes in our archive: doge −69 percent, shiba −75 percent, floki −82 percent, pepe −83 percent, bonk −83 percent, wif −91 percent. All the peaks fall between November 13 and December 9, 2024.

That’s what the single case hides and the group shows. The coin born from a joke lost 88 percent, but everyone who bought attention that November paid the same bill, however good the story behind it. And the attention drained away slowly, all together, for a whole year.

What I do with this story

The cynical reading going around is that sooner or later someone will pump it back up, because it’s cheaper to push a coin people remember than to build a new one. Maybe. The name is memorable, the community still exists, and in its category that’s the only asset that counts. But that reasoning is about the next buyer after you. It says nothing about what you own.

The wrong reading is the opposite one: writing it all off as collective madness. A billion dollars raised in two months by a project with no promise at all is information. It says that in this market the most memorable story beats the most sensible one. And it says so with a cleaner experiment than any analysis, because every other variable was set to zero.

What I do with it is use it as a yardstick. When a project lands in front of me with the technology, the five-year plan and the partnerships, the first question I ask is how much of its price is the same thing that pushed that coin up. Usually the answer is more than zero, and knowing that changes how much I put in, even when I decide to go in.

put bluntly
a billion raised without promising anything is less crazy than it looks: it tells you what this market really buys

Put bluntly: a billion dollars raised in two months without promising anything is less crazy than it looks, because it shows that the most memorable story beats the most sensible one.

−69% … −91% where the six memecoins in our archive
stood a year later
position 010 · November 30, 2025 · no outcome declaredall the opinions