← opinion

The four-year cycle is over, and a day count that works doesn’t prove otherwise

The October 6 peak arrived 1,426 days after the previous one: the calendar followed the theory, and the market’s structure didn’t.
the position
The four-year cycle as a pattern of behavior is over. The peak came when it was supposed to, 1,426 days after the previous one, but with none of what goes with it: retail investors never came in, large holders aren’t selling, and the altcoin season lasted three weeks.

June 2022: where the pattern broke

Luna goes from a hundred and twenty dollars to zero in two days. Celsius freezes withdrawals with eight billion dollars of customers’ money inside. Three Arrows Capital blows up with more than ten billion of exposure. The market hits the cycle low, and so far it’s the usual script.

What happens next, though, isn’t in the script. In the bounce, the altcoins rise more than bitcoin: in the eight weeks after the June low, ethereum gains 54.7 percent against bitcoin. In a phase where everyone usually runs toward the most solid asset, capital does the opposite.

The reason given at the time was ethereum’s move to proof of stake. It sparked bull-market stories right at the lowest point of a bear market: “the flippening”, “the coin that burns itself”. And here’s the first real anomaly, which has nothing to do with price: retail investors don’t leave. They usually capitulate at the lows and come back when the rally is already halfway through.

June 2022in the bounce off the low the altcoins rise more than bitcoin
November 2022bitcoin makes a new low, ethereum doesn’t
all through 2023-24the retail saver neither capitulates nor comes back
November 2024the altcoin season lasts three weeks instead of twelve

The anomalies against previous cycles, in chronological order: June 2022, the altcoins outperform Bitcoin in the bounce off the low; November 2022, Bitcoin marks a new low and Ethereum doesn’t; 2024, the retail saver doesn’t capitulate; November 2024, the altcoin season lasts three weeks instead of the historical eight to sixteen.

November 2022: bitcoin under, ethereum over

FTX collapses with an eight-billion hole and the contagion spreads everywhere. Bitcoin makes a new cycle low, falling from June’s $18,971 to $15,781, which is what’s supposed to happen when the main asset gives way.

Ethereum doesn’t follow it: its November low is $1,103, 10.8 percent above the June low. And it isn’t alone, because most of the fifty largest coins don’t make a new low that month.

the june lowsethereum · 10.8% abovebitcoin · new low
from the june 2022 low, bitcoin goes on to a new low in november and ethereum stays above its own. source: cointalks archive, daily closes.

Starting from the June 2022 lows, in November Bitcoin falls below its own previous low (from $18,971 to $15,781), while Ethereum’s low stays 10.8 percent above June’s ($1,103 against $995).

This is where the pattern breaks in a way you can check. In every previous fall, when bitcoin gave way the altcoins dropped with a multiplier of two to three. Here they hold. The second anomaly is about who falls rather than how far, and who falls tells you far more.

The calendar followed the theory, and the market didn’t

The rally that stopped after three weeks

In January 2024 the ETFs arrive on the American market, and capital comes in steadily instead of in waves. In the first half of the year the market behaves as it does in every rally: the joke coins explode, the AI projects do multiples, and retail investors go back to searching “how to buy crypto”.

Then comes November 2024. Trump is elected, bitcoin gains 37.1 percent in three weeks and ethereum 66.7 percent in five. Volume, breadth, momentum: every indicator says the altcoin season has started.

And then it stops dead. The market goes back to test the starting levels, barely breaks them, and begins a distribution that lasts for months. The third anomaly is this: the altcoin season lasted three weeks, when it usually lasts eight to sixteen. It wasn’t so much a weak season as a season that never happened.

the shortest beforeeight weeksthe longest beforesixteen weeksNovember 2024three weeks
how long the altcoin seasons lasted in previous cycles, and how long this one lasted. source: historical durations declared in the november 2025 analysis.

In previous cycles the phase of altcoin outperformance lasted between eight and sixteen weeks. In November 2024 it stopped after three weeks.

What the onchain data said, at that moment

Here the numbers aren’t ours and should be taken for what they are: snapshots taken at the time with third-party tools, which we can’t reproduce exactly today. I report them because they’re the part of the argument you can’t see in the price.

The peak of unrealized gains, the indicator that usually marks euphoria, had been reached in March 2024, a year and a half before the autumn of 2025. The ratio between holders in profit and holders at a loss was around 1.9, against the reading above 4 that had come with every real peak in previous cycles.

The addresses holding more than a thousand bitcoin had shrunk by eight to twelve percent in a few months at the 2017 and 2021 peaks. In the autumn of 2025 they had grown by three percent. And retail activity, which explodes at every all-time high, was at its lows. Three different measures saying the same thing: if that was a cycle peak, it was the first one without any of the behavior that always comes with it.

October 6: the day count that works

The peak arrives on October 6, 2025, at a close of $124,659, exactly 1,426 days after the peak of November 10, 2021. That’s what the four-year cycle theory predicts, and the precision is striking.
$64,882Nov 2021$124,659Oct 2025$92,961today
the two highest closes and the point we are at. source: cointalks archive, daily closes.

The highest close of November 10, 2021 was $64,882; that of October 6, 2025 was $124,659, 1,426 days later. As of November 18, 2025 the price is $92,961, 25.4 percent below the peak.

Two weeks later the market has lost a fifth and broken every moving average people usually watch. Today, 25.4 percent below that peak, the price is $92,961, and the low of this fall was set yesterday at $92,215. Even the depth is what the manual calls for at this point in the cycle.

But that’s where the manual ends. In the year after the halving, bitcoin’s annual candle usually closes a hundred and twenty to a hundred and eighty percent higher. This year, in mid-November, we’re at −1.7 percent: flat, red in fact. The day count followed the theory and the shape of the move didn’t. And it’s the shape, rather than the date on the calendar, that tells you what the market is doing.

The evidence on one side and the evidence on the other

Lining them up keeps you from picking only the convenient ones. On the side of those who say a long decline has begun there are serious points: the peak came on the predicted day, the correction has broken every moving average that matters, some large coins set their all-time high shortly before turning, and volumes have been shrinking for weeks.

On the other side there are points just as serious and harder to explain. Large holders are accumulating instead of distributing. Retail investors never came in, and without them there’s nobody to sell to at the top. Unrealized gains are far from the euphoria zone, the ETF flows continue, and the altcoins have held their historical supports.

The honest reading is that neither list wins on points. What you can say is that the first is made of price and the second of behavior, and previous cycles were always defined by behavior.

the two readings
says long declinesays consolidation
the peak arrives when predictedwhoever holds large amounts is accumulating
the main moving averages are brokenthe retail saver never came in
all-time highs shortly before the turnunrealized gains far from euphoria
contracting volumesthe etf flows continue
the evidence, set side by side instead of picked.

In favor of a long decline: the timing of the peak matches the theory, the correction has broken the main moving averages, some large coins set their all-time high shortly before turning, and volumes are shrinking. Against: whoever holds large amounts is accumulating, the retail saver never came in, unrealized gains are far from euphoria, the ETF flows continue, and the altcoins have held their supports.

What killed the cycle, if it is dead

If it’s dead, what killed it first was the arrival of the institutions. The ETFs brought steady, predictable flows in place of waves of enthusiasm, and someone buying a fixed amount every month doesn’t draw the same shapes as someone buying everything in three weeks. Volatility comes down and the timelines stretch.

The second is maturity. Bitcoin today is a recognized asset that sells itself as digital gold rather than as the promise of a technological revolution, and mature assets have longer, gentler cycles. So the victory of the institutional story kills the very pattern that made all this famous.

The third hypothesis is more interesting and less proven: that the cycle has shortened rather than died, three years instead of four, with the red annual candle signaling an early reset. With a single case I have no way to check it. Anyone selling it to you as a certainty is selling you another calendar theory, right after you’ve watched the first one fail.

My position, and what would change it

We’re in a consolidation dressed up as a long decline. A real decline would come with the behavior that goes with it, and all of it is missing here. But the price isn’t strong enough yet to call it a rally. It’s the moment when the old manual has stopped working and nobody has written the new one yet.

In practice that means two things. The trades built on the altcoin multiplier, buying whatever moves most because everything rises anyway, are the ones losing most, and they’ll keep losing until the season restarts. And anyone with a long horizon has an accumulation window in front of them, with downside limited by the institutional flows, which is exactly the kind of risk you can size.

put bluntly
the cycle worked because somebody always turned up at the top to buy. this time nobody turned up at the top

Put bluntly: the four-year cycle worked because somebody always turned up to buy at the top in the end. This time nobody turned up at the top, and the chart keeps turning anyway.

The position changes if one of three things happens: large holders really start distributing, the ETF flows reverse for more than a quarter, or retail investors come back in force. At that point the cycle peak would go back to being what it always was, the moment when there’s finally someone to sell to.

1,426 days between the two highest closes,
where the theory called for 1,400
the words in this piece · 5
burn
the permanent destruction of tokens: they are sent to an address nobody can move them from ever again, and the quantity in circulation falls.
halving
the scheduled halving of how many new bitcoin enter circulation, about every four years.
onchain
happening on the chain, and therefore verifiable by anybody.
proof of stake
the way of keeping a network standing by making whoever validates it lock tokens up, instead of spending energy.
retail
the public of small investors, as against the professional operators.
position 001 · November 18, 2025 · no outcome declaredall the opinions